NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• 602x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 15.3x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 275 Watt
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 89.325
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1366.314
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 10.034
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 98.765
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 540.645
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 6300
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 6300

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 947 MHz vs 855 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• 4x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8313 vs 7845
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 461
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 42926
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2238
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7845 8313
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	461 775
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	42926 102277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 540.645
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3354

Compare specifications (specs)