NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• 667.2x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40148 vs 35362
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 119.148
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1373.562
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 8.694
• 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 21.766
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 454.799

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

• Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10082 vs 7787
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 480
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 2476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2238
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 2476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7787 10082
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	480 747
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40148 35362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 119.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1373.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 8.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 21.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 454.799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3340

Compare specifications (specs)