NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7787 vs 7540
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40148 vs 35722
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7787 vs 7540 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40148 vs 35722 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 480
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3643 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2238
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3643 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 480 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7787 | 7540 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 698 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40148 | 35722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Place in performance rating | 357 | 358 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 345.6 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 38.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580X
