NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1380 MHz
• 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 80 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 855 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 11.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 7788
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 483
• Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 40286
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2238
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7788 10967
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	483 498
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40286 63532
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3361

Compare specifications (specs)