NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 vs 6871
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 vs 405
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 7682
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 7682
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 vs 6871 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 vs 405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 7682 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41046 vs 40286
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3703 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2238
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3703 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41046 vs 40286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 6871 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 405 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 41046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU117 |
| Place in performance rating | 350 | 395 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 3.318 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 51.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 103.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
