NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 40 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 versus 6871
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 versus 405
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 versus 7682
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 versus 7682
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 40 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 versus 6871 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 versus 405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 versus 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 versus 7682 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 103.7 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 41046 versus 40286
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3703 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2238
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3703 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 103.7 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41046 versus 40286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 6871 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 405 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 41046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU117 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 350 | 395 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 3.318 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 45.60 GPixel/s | 51.84 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 103.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
