NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7990
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 7990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 48.7x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 vs 6689
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 vs 6689
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6871 vs 5566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 24 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 vs 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 vs 6689 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6871 vs 5566 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7990
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 405
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3703 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 405 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7990
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41046 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 766 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6871 | 5566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 88.665 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1753.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.328 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 434.598 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Malta |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 24 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 395 | 417 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $1,126.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 307 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
