NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA P102-100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA P102-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 327.7x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 316.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 12 February 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 316.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P102-100
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 3.1x more pipelines: 3200 vs 1024
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65773 vs 41046
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3200 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65773 vs 41046 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA P102-100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41046 | 65773 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6871 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA P102-100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 12 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 395 | 308 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 3200 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 316.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 400.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |

