NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs ATI Radeon X800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and ATI Radeon X800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 30052.6x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 3.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 110 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 8.1x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 986 MHz
- 85.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7195 vs 84
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 448 vs 423
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 November 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 3.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 986 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7195 vs 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 448 vs 423 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 GT
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 60 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | ATI Radeon X800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7195 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 448 | 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | ATI Radeon X800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | R400 |
Code name | TU117 | R430 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 November 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 378 | 376 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 110 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 3.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0b |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 31.55 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 986 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |