AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 451
Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3426 vs 3319

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Texture fill rate	124.8 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1536 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	675 vs 451
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3426 vs 3319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 85 Watt
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7139 vs 6820
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 36526
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 9175
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3670
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 9175
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3670

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 85 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7139 vs 6820
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 36526
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 3670

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6820

7139

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

675

451

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36526

38863

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9175

9313

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3670

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9175

9313

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3670

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3426

3319

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	6820	7139
PassMark - G2D Mark	675	451
Geekbench - OpenCL	36526	38863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	105.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1860.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	596.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9175	9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3670	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9175	9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3670	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3426	3319

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 14	TU117
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	27 May 2019
Place in performance rating	365	368
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1785 MHz
Compute units	24
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	249.6 GFLOPS (1:16)	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS (2:1)	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.994 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1536	1024
Pixel fill rate	41.60 GPixel/s	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	124.8 GTexel/s	114.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	4700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5