AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 663 vs 448
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3426 vs 3319
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 663 vs 448 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 vs 3319 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7189 vs 6775
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 36824
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3670
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3670
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7189 vs 6775 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 36824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3670 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6775 | 7189 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 663 | 448 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36824 | 38863 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 377 | 378 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |