AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 663 vs 448
  • Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3426 vs 3319
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Texture fill rate 124.8 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines 1536 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 663 vs 448
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3426 vs 3319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz
  • Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 85 Watt
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7189 vs 6775
  • Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 36824
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 9175
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3670
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 9175
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3670
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 85 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7189 vs 6775
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 vs 36824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 vs 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 vs 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 3670

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6775
7189
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
663
448
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36824
38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9175
9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3670
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9175
9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3670
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3426
3319
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5500M NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 6775 7189
PassMark - G2D Mark 663 448
Geekbench - OpenCL 36824 38863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1860.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 596.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9175 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3670 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9175 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3670 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3426 3319

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
Code name Navi 14 TU117
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 377 378
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 1785 MHz
Compute units 24
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.994 TFLOPS 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1536 1024
Pixel fill rate 41.60 GPixel/s 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 124.8 GTexel/s 114.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 4700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 8000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5