NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1480 MHz
964.5x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 80 Watt
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 407
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 30239

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 407
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 30239
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7903 vs 7209
Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 9313
Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 9313

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1280 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7903 vs 7209
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12767 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3712 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12767 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3712 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7209

7903

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

444

407

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

30239

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

12767

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

12767

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3359

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

3316

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	7209	7903
PassMark - G2D Mark	444	407
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	30239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	12767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	12767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	3316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		147.271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1681.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		98.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		416.14

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP106
Launch date	27 May 2019	27 June 2017
Place in performance rating	378	379
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1480 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1063 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1280
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	118.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		3,789 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	8008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready