NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 5490.4x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 1024 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 10.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7168 vs 658
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 453 vs 225
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 64 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7168 vs 658 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 453 vs 225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7168 | 658 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 453 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
Code name | TU117 | G94B |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 699 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 64 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 20.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 505 million |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |