NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1708 MHz
- 928.5x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 31475
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1708 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 31475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 1024
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9758 vs 7160
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 vs 452
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 9313
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 9313
- Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3844 vs 3319
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9758 vs 7160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 vs 452 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 vs 9313 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3844 vs 3319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7160 | 9758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 | 777 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 31475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 3844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP106 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 366 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1152 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |