NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1708 MHz
  • 928.5x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 31475
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 18 August 2016
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1708 MHz
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 vs 31475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

  • Around 13% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 1024
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9758 vs 7160
  • Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 vs 452
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 9313
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 9313
  • Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3844 vs 3319
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1152 vs 1024
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9758 vs 7160
PassMark - G2D Mark 777 vs 452
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10566 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10566 vs 9313
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3844 vs 3319

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7160
9758
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
452
777
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38863
31475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3319
3844
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 7160 9758
PassMark - G2D Mark 452 777
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 31475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319 3844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 115.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1325.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.057
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 425.709

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU117 GP106
Launch date 27 May 2019 18 August 2016
Place in performance rating 368 366
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $199

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1785 MHz 1708 MHz
Core clock speed 1575 MHz 1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 1152
Pixel fill rate 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s 123.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 120 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 4,400 million
Floating-point performance 3,935 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 250 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 8008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5