NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and Intel Arc A580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 6 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15470 vs 11534
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 6 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15470 vs 11534 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A580
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1635 MHz
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 326.4 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 718 vs 622
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86110 vs 79683
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1635 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 718 vs 622 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86110 vs 79683 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: Intel Arc A580
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Intel Arc A580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 622 | 718 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15470 | 11534 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79683 | 86110 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Intel Arc A580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
Code name | AD107 | DG2-512 |
Place in performance rating | 99 | 102 |
Launch date | 2022 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 6 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 67.68 GPixel/s | 163.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s | 326.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 175 Watt |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.89 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.44 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 21700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |