NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1143 vs 996
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1143 vs 996 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 3072
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22347 vs 17877
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123332 vs 79691
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22347 vs 17877 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123332 vs 79691 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1143 | 996 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17877 | 22347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79691 | 123332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13676 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA104 |
Place in performance rating | 44 | 46 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 67.68 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 220 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |