NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4608 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 266.4 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1018 vs 643
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25034 vs 18947
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151497 vs 113687
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 266.4 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1018 vs 643 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25034 vs 18947 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151497 vs 113687 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | 1018 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18947 | 25034 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113687 | 151497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19444 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | AD104 | Navi 21 |
Place in performance rating | 67 | 69 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 106.6 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 266.4 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 72 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |