NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
- 2.9x more pipelines: 7424 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23314 vs 19887
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138940 vs 97111
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 7424 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23314 vs 19887 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138940 vs 97111 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 941 vs 749
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 vs 749 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 941 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23314 | 19887 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138940 | 97111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12774 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Place in performance rating | 42 | 46 |
| Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 7424 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 17200 million |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIATesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A4500
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
