NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 440.4x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 150x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 10 GB/s
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73370 vs 55514
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3328 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73370 vs 55514 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 vs 5984
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 vs 5984 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 984 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13732 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73370 | 55514 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5984 | 7241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 15 August 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $499.99 |
Place in performance rating | 96 | 287 |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1771 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3328 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |