NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
- Around 46% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 3328
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 971
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 13585
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 73337
- Around 99% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1345
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4864 vs 3328 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 971 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 13585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 73337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 989 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 | 20394 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 | 109075 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 | 2671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA106 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 128 | 104 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 4864 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
