NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 199.7 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 526 vs 404
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12647 vs 6494
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 9009
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 9009
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78981 vs 32981
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 526 vs 404 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12647 vs 6494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 9009 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78981 vs 32981 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 526 | 404 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12647 | 6494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78981 | 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU117 |
| Place in performance rating | 174 | 400 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | 69.84 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
