NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• 1559.9x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 6144 vs 3072
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 12748
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 828
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 41155
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 157.231
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 1722.566
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 12.245
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 38.225
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 518.554
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 9834
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 9834
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2604 vs 1231

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19545 12748
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1026 828
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	121768 41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	420.465 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4156.52 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.297 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.131 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1895.111 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2604 1231

Compare specifications (specs)