NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 6144
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 19403
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 1000
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 122777
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 420.465
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 4156.52
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 32.297
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 162.131
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1895.111
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 22050
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 22050
- Around 80% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 vs 11086
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 6144 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26747 vs 19403 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 vs 1000 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191350 vs 122777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 420.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 4156.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 32.297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 162.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1895.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 22050 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 vs 11086 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19403 | 26747 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 | 1050 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122777 | 191350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 732.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 7585.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 63.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 247.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 2441.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11086 | 19948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA104 | GA102 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 106 | 45 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Triple-slot |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |