NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1080.1x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19442 vs 12614
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1006 vs 672
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121329 vs 52839
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 223.558
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 2698.914
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 14.206
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 140.845
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 927.006
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 15489
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3077
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 15489
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3077
- Around 83% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10991 vs 6008
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 1 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19442 vs 12614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1006 vs 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121329 vs 52839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10991 vs 6008 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19442 | 12614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1006 | 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121329 | 52839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10991 | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 107 | 241 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,699.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |