NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19442 versus 12614
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1006 versus 672
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121329 versus 52839
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 223.558
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 2698.914
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 14.206
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 140.845
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 927.006
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 15489
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3077
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 15489
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3077
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10991 versus 6008
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 1 October 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 2048 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19442 versus 12614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1006 versus 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121329 versus 52839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10991 versus 6008 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 5.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19442 | 12614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1006 | 672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121329 | 52839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10991 | 6008 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 107 | 241 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,699.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |