NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 962 vs 901
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23631 vs 18151
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Apr 2021 vs 2 July 2019
Pipelines 8192 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 962 vs 901
PassMark - G3D Mark 23631 vs 18151

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1170 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz
  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25207 vs 22582
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25207 vs 22582
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 1170 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 215 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25207 vs 22582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25207 vs 22582
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
962
901
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
23631
18151
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22582
25207
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22582
25207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3359
Name NVIDIA RTX A5000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark 962 901
PassMark - G3D Mark 23631 18151
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 22582 25207
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 22582 25207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3359
Geekbench - OpenCL 97465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1438.826
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA RTX A5000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA102 TU104
Launch date 12 Apr 2021 2 July 2019
Place in performance rating 39 49
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1695 MHz 1770 MHz
Core clock speed 1170 MHz 1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 27.77 TFLOPS
Pipelines 8192 2560
Pixel fill rate 162.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 433.9 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 230 Watt 215 Watt
Transistor count 28300 million 13.6 B
CUDA cores 2560
Maximum GPU temperature 88 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches) 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt 650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 6 pin + 8 pin
Width 112 mm (4.4 inches) 2-Slot
Height 4.556” (115.7mm)

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.6 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 768 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready