NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.2x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22901 vs 18253
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1038 vs 886
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154651 vs 99847
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 293.508
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 4045.784
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 29.145
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 158.103
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1438.826
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 2 July 2019 |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22901 vs 18253 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 vs 886 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154651 vs 99847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 vs 4045.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 29.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 158.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1438.826 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 22508
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 22508
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22901 | 18253 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 | 886 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154651 | 99847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 4045.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 29.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 158.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1438.826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA102 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 65 | 133 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 13.6 B |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A5000 with others
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
