NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22901 vs 18872
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1038 vs 791
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154651 vs 74179
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 488.989
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 5451.006
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 41.461
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 153.677
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1534.582
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 19571
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 19571
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22901 vs 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 vs 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154651 vs 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 vs 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 vs 19571 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22901 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154651 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU102 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 65 | 112 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |