NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22847 versus 18872
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1035 versus 791
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154601 versus 74179
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 488.989
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 5451.006
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 41.461
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 153.677
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 1534.582
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 versus 19571
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 versus 19571
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22847 versus 18872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1035 versus 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154601 versus 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 5451.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 versus 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 versus 19571 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1170 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1170 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22847 | 18872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1035 | 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154601 | 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 5451.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA102 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 111 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A5000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
