NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- 3.7x more pipelines: 10752 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 vs 103974
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 vs 326.494
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 vs 31.684
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 vs 159.275
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 vs 1506.874
- Around 63% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 vs 10935
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1860 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Pipelines | 10752 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 vs 103974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 vs 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 vs 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 vs 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 vs 1506.874 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 vs 10935 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18798 vs 4237
- 10.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 905 vs 86
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 23142
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3712
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3353
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 23142
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3712
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18798 vs 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 905 vs 86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 18798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 905 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 103974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 10935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU104 |
Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4649 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 98 | 100 |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1860 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10752 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 625.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |