NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s
• Around 2% higher pipelines: 10752 vs 10496
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 24 GB
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 vs 191350
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 vs 732.196

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 4237
• 12.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 86
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 59.432
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 189.702
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 2347.314
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 23142
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 23142
• Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 vs 17833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4237 26747
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	86 1050
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	200330 191350
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	737.53 732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.432 63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.702 247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2347.314 2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23142 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23142 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	17833 19948

Compare specifications (specs)