NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A6000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 4% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1455 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Etwa 10% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1860 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Texturfüllrate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s
- Etwa 2% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10752 vs 10496
- Etwa 17% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 48 GB vs 24 GB
- Etwa 64% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 vs 191350
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 vs 732.196
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 5 Oct 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1455 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1860 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 625.0 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10752 vs 10496 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 48 GB vs 24 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 vs 191350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 vs 732.196 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- 6.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 4237
- 12.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 86
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 59.432
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 189.702
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 2347.314
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 23142
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 23142
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 vs 17833
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26747 vs 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 vs 86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 59.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 189.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 2347.314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 vs 17833 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 26747 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 1050 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 191350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 732.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 63.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 247.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 2441.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 19948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 5 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $4649 | $1499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 97 | 45 |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1860 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1455 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 10752 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 625.0 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 700 Watt | 750 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 8-pin EPS | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Triple-slot |
Höhe | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 48 GB | 24 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 768 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |