NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1395 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 556.0 GTexel/s
- Environ 2% de pipelines plus haut: 10752 versus 10496
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 24 GB
- Environ 64% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 versus 191350
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 732.196
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1395 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 10496 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 24 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 versus 191350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 732.196 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- 6.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 versus 4237
- 12.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 versus 86
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 59.432
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 189.702
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 2347.314
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 23142
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 23142
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 versus 17833
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26747 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 versus 86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 versus 59.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 versus 189.702 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 2347.314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 versus 17833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 26747 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 1050 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 191350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 732.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 63.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 247.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 2441.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 19948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GA102 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $1499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 97 | 45 |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Triple-slot |
| Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 384 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
