NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1304 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1442 MHz
• 1936.2x more texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 10752 vs 3584
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• 3x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 16 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1430 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 vs 89068
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 vs 355.937
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 vs 25.191
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 vs 144.928
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 vs 1056.078
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 vs 16640
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 vs 16640

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15149 vs 4237
• 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 836 vs 86
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3712
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3353
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3712
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4237 15149
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	86 836
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	193937 89068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	735.8 355.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.523 25.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.784 144.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342.233 1056.078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23142 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 22133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23142 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 22133

Compare specifications (specs)