NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1304 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 3584
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1430 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 versus 88540
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 versus 355.937
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 versus 25.191
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 versus 144.928
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 versus 1056.078
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 16640
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 16640
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 1 October 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1304 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 3584 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 16 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1430 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 versus 88540 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 versus 355.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 versus 25.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 versus 144.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 versus 1056.078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 16640 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 235 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15149 versus 4237
- 9.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 836 versus 86
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 3712
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 3353
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 3712
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15149 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 836 versus 86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 15149 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 836 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 88540 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 355.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 25.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 144.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 1056.078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 22133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 22133 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GP100 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 94 | 93 |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1442 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1304 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 15,300 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1430 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
