NVIDIA T400 versus AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and AMD Radeon RX 550 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1183 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17008 versus 11628
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 33.507
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 3.064
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 52.533
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 versus 140.911
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 versus 4485
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2173 versus 940
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 2158
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 4485
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2173 versus 940
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 2158
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1183 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17008 versus 11628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 versus 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 versus 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 2158 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 420 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 5.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 785.059
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 420 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 785.059 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17008 | 11628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 1037.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2718 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 129 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU117 | Lexa |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 886 | 889 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 2,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | 400 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |