NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 577.7x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 47 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 vs 15667

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• 3x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 420 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 58.805
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 785.059
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 3.961
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 53.111
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 222.15
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 5088
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2173
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 5088
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2173

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17019 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.805 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.059 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.961 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222.15 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5088 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2173 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5088 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2173 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3348

Compare specifications (specs)