NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3199 vs 2476
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3199 vs 2476
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2238
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 2238 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 5095
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 5095
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40286 vs 28574
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 896 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 5095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 5095 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 vs 28574 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 2238 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28574 | 40286 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | |
| Place in performance rating | 625 | 350 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1425 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | 2.918 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | 45.60 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M10
