NVIDIA T600 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and AMD Radeon Pro 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 1668.8x more texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27832 vs 9114
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 26.707
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1176.034 vs 568.609
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 2.409
  • Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.328 vs 39.784
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 263.201 vs 126.562
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Apr 2021 vs 30 October 2016
Texture fill rate 53.40 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 27832 vs 9114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 93.685 vs 26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1176.034 vs 568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.06 vs 2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 55.328 vs 39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 263.201 vs 126.562

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
  • 4.1x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed 800 MHz vs 735 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 450

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
27832
9114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
93.685
26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1176.034
568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.06
2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
55.328
39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
263.201
126.562
Name NVIDIA T600 AMD Radeon Pro 450
Geekbench - OpenCL 27832 9114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 93.685 26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1176.034 568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.06 2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 55.328 39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 263.201 126.562
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723
PassMark - G2D Mark 619
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA T600 AMD Radeon Pro 450

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 4.0
Code name TU117 Baffin
Launch date 12 Apr 2021 30 October 2016
Place in performance rating 793 794
Type Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1335 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 53.40 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.709 TFLOPS
Pipelines 640 640
Pixel fill rate 42.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 53.40 GTexel/s 32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 3,000 million
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Recommended system power (PSU) 200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0