NVIDIA T600 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and AMD Radeon Pro 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1668.8x more texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27832 vs 9114
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 26.707
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1176.034 vs 568.609
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 2.409
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.328 vs 39.784
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 263.201 vs 126.562
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 30 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27832 vs 9114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 vs 26.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 vs 568.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 vs 2.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 vs 39.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 vs 126.562 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 450
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T600 | AMD Radeon Pro 450 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27832 | 9114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 | 26.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 | 568.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 | 2.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 | 39.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 | 126.562 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T600 | AMD Radeon Pro 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Baffin |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 30 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 793 | 794 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 53.40 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.709 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.72 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 81.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |