NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 6x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 vs 64683
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 3924.968
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 17.305
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 1226.861
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3336
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 12,150 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 174.714 vs 146.609
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 163.551

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	65520 64683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	146.609 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4303.239 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.759 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.551 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382.954 1226.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16138 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16138 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3336

Compare specifications (specs)