NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 16.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 256 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 288.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3176 vs 11
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 283
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 1 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 vs 11 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 283 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
- 11.9x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 238 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 | 11 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 283 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Rage 9 |
Code name | GF100 | RV380 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 1 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 591 | 593 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x VHDCI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Length | 248 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |