NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 4x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 256 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 13x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3176 vs 244
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 273
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 11 August 2005 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 vs 244 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 273 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 238 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 | 244 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 273 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
Code name | GF100 | G70 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 11 August 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 593 | 596 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Price now | $80 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.16 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 302 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 226 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |