AMD FirePro D700 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D700 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 4.6x more pipelines: 2048 vs 448
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25284 vs 11024
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 26.055
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 vs 901.157
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 2.99
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 vs 41.654
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25284 vs 11024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 vs 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 vs 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 vs 2.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 vs 41.654 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 238 Watt vs 274 Watt
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3718
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3348
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3718
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3348
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25284 | 11024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | 2.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 | 41.654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 9064 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | GF100 |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 591 | 592 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |