NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 796 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 56.64 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
- Around 76% better floating-point performance: 1,812 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3985 vs 3176
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 362
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14562 vs 11024
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 vs 26.055
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.697 vs 2.99
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.868 vs 89.869
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 April 2016 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 796 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3985 vs 3176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 vs 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14562 vs 11024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 vs 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.697 vs 2.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.868 vs 89.869 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 639.056
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 vs 35.796
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3684
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3325
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3684
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3325
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 vs 639.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 vs 35.796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 3325 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3985 | 3176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 | 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14562 | 11024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.056 | 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.697 | 2.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.796 | 41.654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.868 | 89.869 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 9064 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM206 | GF100 |
Launch date | 8 April 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $437.75 | |
Place in performance rating | 591 | 593 |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1163 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 796 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP | 1x DVI |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |