NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2070 and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 448 vs 80
- 10.7x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 24x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1310 MHz
- 13.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 236
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 429
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 558
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 558
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 30 September 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1310 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3121 vs 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 238 Watt
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3121 | 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 | 429 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3245 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3245 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF100 | RV710 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 30 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 757 | 759 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 10.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 1310 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |