NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 29.3x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 150 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
- 5.9x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 512 MHz
- 431x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 7
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 225
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 12 November 2002 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 512 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 7 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 vs 225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 | 7 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10493 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Celsius |
Code name | GF110 | NV18 A4 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 12 November 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 788 | 785 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 247 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 8.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 512 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |