AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 247 Watt
• Around 69% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 428
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 126.562 vs 93.747
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3347 vs 2825
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 2825

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2723
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10493 vs 9114
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 26.707
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 568.609
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 2.409
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 39.784
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1749
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1749

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2723 3017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 428
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9114 10493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.707 26.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	568.609 930.623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.409 3.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.784 45.924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	126.562 93.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3346

Compare specifications (specs)