NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 680 MHz
  • 60.3x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 2.72 GTexel / s
  • 67.2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 40
  • 72.3x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 54.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • 24x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 256 MB
  • 6.5x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 47.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4403 vs 93
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 November 2012 vs 7 January 2008
Core clock speed 732 MHz vs 680 MHz
Texture fill rate 164.0 GTexel / s vs 2.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2688 vs 40
Floating-point performance 3,935 gflops vs 54.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4403 vs 93

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470

  • 19.6x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 235 Watt
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 198
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt vs 235 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 250 vs 198

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4403
93
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
198
250
Name NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470
PassMark - G3D Mark 4403 93
PassMark - G2D Mark 198 250
Geekbench - OpenCL 16879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1666.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 92.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 275.229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7038

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale
Code name GK110 M82
Launch date 12 November 2012 7 January 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $7,699
Place in performance rating 716 719
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 732 MHz 680 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,935 gflops 54.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 2688 40
Texture fill rate 164.0 GTexel / s 2.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 235 Watt 12 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 181 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-II
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 249.6 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR2 / GDDR3
Shared memory 0