NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16664 vs 16577
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 46.352
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 930.114
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 3.656
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 29.836
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 97.861
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 1673
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 1673

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 164.0 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 2688
• Around 59% better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 3,935 gflops
• Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5200 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5489 vs 4403
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 463 vs 198
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1849 vs 1032
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1849 vs 1032

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4403 5489
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	198 463
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16664 16577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.455 46.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1666.354 930.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.836 3.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	92.472 29.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	275.229 97.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 1849
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7038 1673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 1849
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7038 1673

Compare specifications (specs)