NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs ATI All-In-Wonder X1900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20m and ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 18.4x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 20x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 256 MB
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 34.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4432 vs 127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2013 vs 13 January 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 954 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4432 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder X1900
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 210
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 210 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder X1900
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4432 | 127 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 445 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16085 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.291 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8319 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8319 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla K20m | ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | R500 |
| Code name | GK110 | R580 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2013 | 13 January 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 414 | 383 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 2496 | |
| Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 384 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | 30.53 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
