NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs AMD FirePro S7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20m and AMD FirePro S7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s
- Around 95% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1280
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.89 vs 52.282
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.755 vs 1275.287
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.807 vs 66.159
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2013 vs 27 August 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops vs 2,432 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.89 vs 52.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 vs 1275.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 vs 66.159 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7000
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4524 vs 4432
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 210
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.886 vs 5.303
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 271.967 vs 250.291
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4524 vs 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.886 vs 5.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 271.967 vs 250.291 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | AMD FirePro S7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4432 | 4524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16085 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.89 | 52.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 | 1275.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.303 | 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 | 66.159 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.291 | 271.967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20m | AMD FirePro S7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK110 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 5 January 2013 | 27 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | $1,249 |
Place in performance rating | 414 | 415 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2496 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 292 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |