NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
64.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.0 billion / sec
11.1x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 448
8x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
19.2x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 1280 MB
3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17090 vs 11010
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.435 vs 27.93
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 980.005
Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.764 vs 47.309
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 198.978 vs 97.852
Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 3.268

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2014 vs 26 March 2010
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.0 billion / sec
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 448
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 1280 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	17090 vs 11010
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.435 vs 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1476.444 vs 980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.764 vs 47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	198.978 vs 97.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.289 vs 3.268

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

2.2x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 300 Watt

Core clock speed	1215 MHz vs 562 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	215 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

17090

11010

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

64.435

27.93

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1476.444

980.005

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

75.764

47.309

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

198.978

97.852

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.289

3.268

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Geekbench - OpenCL	17090	11010
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.435	27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1476.444	980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.764	47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	198.978	97.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.289	3.268
PassMark - G3D Mark		3107
PassMark - G2D Mark		406
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3317
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GK210	GF100
Launch date	17 November 2014	26 March 2010
Place in performance rating	805	802
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$349
Price now		$522.01
Value for money (0-100)		6.87
Technical info
Boost clock speed	876 MHz
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1215 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops	1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	2x 2496	448
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec	34.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	215 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	3,100 million
CUDA cores		448
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	Two 6-pins
Bus support		16x PCI-E 2.0
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 12 GB	1280 MB
Memory bandwidth	2x 240.6 GB / s	133.9 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 384 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround